Support your local pub! Latona Pub celebrates 20 years near Greenlake

Fancy kegger at Latona Pub;Seattle’s Latona Pub (6423 Latona Ave. N.E.) marks 20 years Saturday serving craft brews and hearty eats near Green Lake.A weeklong celebration includes a cask festival Thursday with live music; an old-timers’ night Friday with hall-of-fame bartenders; and a 1 p.m. anniversary barbecue Saturday with special anniversary beers, a beer-trivia competition at 8 p.m. and music by Leif Totusek & Friends at 9 p.m.Latona manager Elliott Ryan and kitchen manager and menu designer Jed Lutge say cheers to all their brewer friends who have made it all possible. Call 206-525-2238 for celebration information.http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/restaurants/2003836277_foodbriefs15.html 

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Transit on my mind…

So, we’ve all been inundated by WSDOT telling us to stay off the highways during the shut down on I-5 and today’s Seattle Times shows that they’ve done such a good job of convincing us about it that traffic has been better than the past 15 year’s time (my personal opinion on that timeline) because people are taking alternate routes, alternate transportation or just plain not getting on the roadway. While I am all in favor of alternate modes of transportation this August exercise in changing habits makes me wonder if the citizens of Puget Sound are willing to consider longer term changes in transportation.

Coming up this fall (November 2007) the tri-county area will have the opportunity to vote on a new roads & transit package for Sound Transit.  The high-level overview of it is that it will provide improvements to current highways, 50 new miles of light rail (including to the Eastside), new HOV lanes, bike lanes/sidewalks/connections, and improvement on major freight routes. Each county has specific items that they’ll gain as benefits as well but what is truly important about the package to pass is that 2 contiguous counties must approve it for it to pass.  That means we can’t have just Snohomish and Pierce pass the measure, it must include King County in there somewhere – and most preferably have all 3 counties agree to pass it so we can get all of the benefits that are part of the proposal.

As a member of the Government & Public Affairs Committee within Seattle King County Association of Realtors(R), I have been present at many discussions of the Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID) along with many of my counterparts and we all support the plan. As real estate agents we understand how transportation affects our clients as well as the business community, which in turn affects home prices and quality of life. It is all enmeshed together. 

One significant point that was brought up at the last meeting I was able to attend was that some of the issues with the Pierce County section of the plan are being held up or threatened by an environmental group.  According to one of the folks at the meeting this group is trying to protect a wooded portion of land that is made up of trees that are not indigenous to the area – they were transplanted here about 100 years ago. This may be a mis-guided attempt to conserve and the area in question is an important link to the military bases in Pierce County. Not being able to provide better transit access to these areas could cause those bases to be put on close down lists within the Federal Government which would then put Pierce County at risk for massive job losses.  Surely some other kind of environmental mitigation could occur to preserve land areas that could allow for a work-around here.

Read the report and feel free to weigh in here about the plan!

This vote happens in November, but in the meantime don’t forget to vote in the August 21 Primary and Special Election!  Part of this election has measures regarding parks and open space funding, including funds for the much beloved Woodland Park Zoo.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

20+ questions for landlords to ask prospective management companies

This morning, I was contacted by a real estate agent from Tuscon, AZ today asking for some help with finding property management companies in Wichita, KS.  I currently own 2 properties in Wichita, a 4-plex and a duplex, and right now my brother manages them for me. In Kansas you don’t have to have a real estate license to manage property as long as it is 4 units or fewer in number. In Washington, if you are managing another person’s property, that is not a family member, you must be licensed to receive compensation.

Anyhow, this agent asked me if I had a firm I could recommend in Wichita since she had read the less than flattering review of another company that I used previously. I sent her an Excel spreadsheet that I had my assistant put together for me with a list of questions that I gave her to use to pre-qualify the companies she found online.  Here is the list of questions I used; perhaps you will find them useful too.  These are by no means a comprehensive or exhaustive list of everything you should ask, but it’s a start and can lead to additional information you may want regarding the company you’re considering hiring. These questions are reasonable for both in-town and out-of-town landlords to ask a management firm.

1. What are your management fees on a monthly basis?  Are the fees charged before or after expenses are paid for the month?

2. What are your “lease up” fees for getting a new tenant?

3. Is the cost of advertising wrapped into the lease up fee or is the owner charged separately for these costs?

4. What advertising methods do you use?  Do you do a combination of print and online advertising?  Is advertising on-going or only as vacancies arise?  Do you pool fees from multiple clients to do annual on-going advertising?

5. What are your reporting methods for financial data?  Will I get an annual statement at the end of the year besides monthly statements?

6. Do you offer annual maintenance agreements or other methods to check-up on the properties under your management?

7. How is maintenance handled on an ad-hoc basis?  Do you have your own maintenance staff or do you hire out?

8. How do you handle the move-in/move-out checklist for tenants? Are digital photos taken during the move-in/move-out periods to help augment checklists to secure deposits and to handle charging for damages above normal wear and tear on a unit? 

9. Do you require the use of your own leases or do you allow other leases to be used on properties your company manages? And, if you use your own lease, will you provide a copy for me to review prior to signing up with your firm? Has your lease been reviewed by an attorney?

10. If an out of state owner wants or needs work done can your firm help to manage the work, and what is the cost to manage it?  If I have a preferred company to use for a certain type of work (eg. plumber, electrician) will you work with them as well?

11. Does your firm also sell property?  If so, will you require me to use your services to sell my property when I am ready to sell, or is that negotiable if I already have my own agent that I prefer to use? Will the decision to use another agent raise the cost of the fees you will charge me?

12. Will you provide a list of references including other out-of-state owners that I may contact?

13. If I have a large number of units or buildings to manage, is there a discount applied or available to negotiate if I turn them over to you for management?

14.  What is your coverage area for property?  Do you limit your business geographically or to certain types or sizes of property?

15. How do you handle doing background and credit checks on rental applicants?  Do you do full criminal background checks and, if so, how far do you search (eg. local, state, national).  Does your background check include registered sex offenders?  If not currently, will you consider doing it for my business?

16. Do you track local market information regarding rent levels, vacancies, etc and do you share that information with your clients?

17. How do you handle notices and evictions with tenants? Have you ever had to appear in court on tenant related issues? What was the outcome of any such court action?

18. Do you belong to any professional organizations for property management? Does your staff have on-going training or educational opportunities related to your field of expertise?

19. Are you licensed? Do you have a copy of local landlord/tenant laws in your office for reference? How do you handle or deliver necessary disclosure forms for tenants?

20. How do you handle Fair Housing requirements in your area? Do you use the same process for each applicant?  Have you ever had a Fair Housing complaint made against you or any of your clients? How do you handle section 8 tenants and the yearly reviews that are required?

These questions aren’t listed in any particular order but you may find them useful.  Even if you’re looking to manage your own property you might consider asking yourself these questions to determine how you’ll handle these things on your own.

For those readers/landlords in the Seattle and surrounding area I would suggest getting to know the Rental Housing Association of Puget Sound too.  They are a great resource for information, forms, education and more. Check them out at http://www.rha-ps.org

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Rental or property sale in Seattle – do you have your Fair Housing sign in view?

http://www.cityofseattle.net/civilrights/documents/fair_hsing_poster.pdf

The City of Seattle requires that landlords and sellers of residential and multi-family property post the above document when leasing or selling a property within the Seattle city limits or at least have it available to be provided in documents that might be handed out about a property.  Read more from the Office of Civil Rights at the following link which will cover more detail about the rule and the fines for non-comliance:  http://www.metrokc.gov/dias/ocre/socrposter.htm

With fines that start at $125 for the first offense and ranging up to $500 it’s worth paying attention.  You can also find information on making a complaint if you believe that you have been discriminated against with regard to housing.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Bridal Bowl 2007 was a tafetta ripping success!!!!

A friend I met via Judy’s Book, Jill Gallagher (see fabulous photo below), has been putting on a fun charity event for the past 4 years called Bridal Bowl.  The charity benefitting from our tafetta induced bowling craze is New Beginnings which helps women and children with its outreach. New Beginnings provides services to women and children whose lives have been affected by physical, emotional, or sexual abuse.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket  This is the great group of gals that gathered for the event.

Our goal for the night was to raise money, awareness, and to bring in donations that would benefit the program and its services.  Piles of goods were brought in and connections were made with other patrons of Sunset Bowl who asked why all us crazy gals were dressed up in our “finery” just to go bowling in Ballard.

Team Reba put together a “team” made up of me and some of our clients (a family of ladies, Judy and her two adult daughters, Haley and Lacey) and I’m pretty sure we may have been the worst scoring team there (mostly due to me trying to bowl left handed for the 1st time) but we still had a fabulous time!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

How do you envision the Puget Sound region by 2040?

If you want to get a voice in how things are shaped for the Puget Sound region over the next 30 or so years, or you just want to see what kinds of data are being collected and the projected outcomes for our region, stop by this website: http://psrc.org/

It’s expected that roughly 50,000 more people per year will migrate to this part of the country for a total of roughly 1.7 Million additional people by 2040 and approximately 1.2 Million additional jobs. These kinds of stats are what continues to drive the housing market in a positive direction for Seattle and surrounding areas.  I say “positive” only from the standpoint of us not having a big crash in our local market in opposition to areas of the country that have fallen drastically due to job losses, over-building, investor hype, etc.

Comments on the plans are open till September 7th.  If you’d rather get heard at a public forum instead of online you can also check out upcoming events in Bellevue and Tacoma.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

important info for home owner’s with actively used oil tanks in WA State

Read the article targeting homeowners with actively used oil tanks linked here. I’ve also done a cut and paste below which shows that this was published by the State of Washington. I found it on the NWReporter that is published by the Seattle King County Association of REALTORS(R). It’s good information and you can contact these folks for an application form. The one on the NWReporter site didn’t seem to be working for me. This info was too necessary for the public to view to let it sit only on the Association’s website… at the end of this post are some other good online resources for homeowner’s (or prospective buyers) with tanks for oil furnaces.

Heating Oil Pollution Liability Insurance Program

NWREporter July 2007

Why It Was Created
To make pollution liability coverage available for owners of active (in use) heating oil tanks because:

  • Owners are responsible for cleanup of contamination if a leak occurs.
  • Coverage is often not available from homeowners’ insurance companies.

How It Is Funded
The program is funded by a fee that heating oil dealers pay per gallon of heating oil sold. Heating oil is defined as diesel, kerosene or stove oil.

Success Of The Program
As of December 2004, over 540 sites have been cleaned and over $5,000,000 has been spent on claims.

What Is Covered

  • Up to $60,000 for cleanup of contamination resulting from accidental releases that start after the active tank is registered with PLIA.
  • Up to $1500 for property restoration (e.g. landscaping).
  • Costs in excess of other valid insurance or warranties.

What Is Not Covered

  • Releases from inactive tanks or other sources.
  • Releases that started before registering with PLIA.
  • Removal/repair/replacement of the tank/lines/furnace.
  • Emergency heat restoration.

How To Apply For Insurance

  • There is no cost to you to register.
  • You must complete and submit to PLIA the attached registration form (instructions on reverse).
  • You are registered when PLIA receives your completed registration form.
  • You must be registered with PLIA prior to the start of any accidental release in order for the cleanup to be covered.
  • When PLIA receives your completed registration form, you will be mailed a confirmation. If you do not receive a confirmation within 14 days please contact PLIA at 1-800-822-3905 or (360) 586-5997.

How Claims Are Filed
If you suspect a release from your active, registered heating oil tank, you must contact PLIA at 1-800-822-3905 or (360) 586-5997 to file a claim.

  • PLIA will investigate the claim, including taking photos of your property and the failed tank.
  • You will hire a contractor to do the cleanup. The contractor must be picked from the list that will be provided by PLIA when you file a claim.
  • All work must be approved by PLIA before the work starts.

Real Estate Transactions
If a registered owner sells the home, or transfers ownership in any way, the registration under the Heating Oil Pollution Liability Insurance Program ENDS. The new owner of the home must register with PLIA, in order to continue the insurance coverage. If the new owner does not register, they WILL NOT have coverage.

The information contained in this publication is not inclusive of all information provided in WAC 374-70, the rules governing the Heating Oil Pollution Liability Insurance Program, nor is it inclusive of all information provided in the insurance policy. These documents will be provided to you in the event of a claim or upon request.

Published by:

State of Washington
Pollution Liability Insurance Agency
1015 10th Ave SE
PO Box 40930
Olympia, WA 98504-0930

(360) 586-5997 • (800) 822-3905 • Fax: (360) 586-7187 • www.plia.wa.gov

Some other links that are good for folks with oil heat:

http://www.ballardoil.com/tankchart.htm

http://www.plia.wa.gov/heating/index.htm

http://www.filcoenviro.com/

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Crazy rental scam in Florida…

A crazy rental scam occurred in Florida that caught the attention of the REALTOR(R) magazine. You have to read it to believe it.  I can’t imagine being the people that were scammed, but then again as a renter you really don’t know who owns a building unless you’ve done some research or a person has shown you proof of ownership.

I thought about this briefly as I was having work done to my 4-plex in Kansas as I spoke with several contractors and neighbors. I kept telling people I owned the building and no one ever questioned me or asked for any kind of proof of ownership. This makes me more aware that as an owner I need to be sure to swap out locks each time a tenant moves out to make sure I don’t have a scam like this on my hands at some point, especially since I am a primarily non-resident owner. If you’re looking for a locksmith you can find one here: http://teamreba.com/resourcecenter.htm#locksmiths

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Staging can make an enormous difference in resale and time on market…

We’ve been offering staging services for several years for our clients and with good results. Over the past 4 years we’ve acquired upwards of about $20,000 of staging equipment that we now have available for use with our clients and we frequently will purchase small items for specific color schemes that we need to work with – this can often mean a new bedding set or curtains. Sometimes it might be a specific color of pot for outdoor plants, etc. I’m going to post a few before and after photos below so you can see the difference a renovation can make. 

One project I worked on for 3 months and actually managed the near full renovation of a client’s home which included picking out paint colors for the interior and exterior, and choosing the new carpet style and color.  I then used a combination of the seller’s belongings and some of our own accent items to stage the house. The photos from this project aren’t as good as some of our listings in the past year because we weren’t yet using Scott Chytil of Chytil Photography for our photos then. But, they still turned out pretty good.  We do really enjoy working with Scott as he really has brought in a new level of professionalism to our listing photos that really helps them shine online – which is what today’s seller really needs to get interest in their home. Between 70-80% of all buyers start out on the Internet when beginning a home search – so as a seller you have to find every advantage to stand out over your competition.

We’ll start with the comparison shots of an Edmonds property we represented this past Spring 2007:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket  Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Here is the final product in a slideshow.  You may have to activate an Active X control on your computer for the slideshow to run properly.  We think it turned out beautifully and so did the buyers that fought over it.  We had 5 offers competing in a 13 hour period for this home which sold for over asking price.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket This is how the front of the house looked after we had it cleaned up with the landscape crew we usually use.  Both the front and back yard areas were prepped prior to sale which included bringing in new beauty bark, edging, mowing, trimming back overgrown bushes and tree branches, etc. We also had a window cleaner, professional house cleaning crew, and photographer involved in prepping the house along with our staging products. The house was empty when we got ahold of it so all of the items you’ll see are part of our staging equipment. We provided feedback to our clients about what should be updated in the home prior to sale and also gave advice on color schemes and finishes.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Is Normandy Park dense?

I’m on an email distribution list for the Master Builder’s Association and their political action committee (PAC) whereby I receive all kinds of information about issues that matter to the MBA.  Most of the time this means topics that impact the costs of developing and building and what local cities are doing to make it harder or more expensive for builders to do business. This item came up in yesterday’s email.

“Word has come forward that Normandy Park has denied further discussion of downzoning lots below 15,000 sqft with the developer who originally proposed 7,200 sqft and 9,000 sqft lots (both denied) on a buildable 3.6 acre parcel in the city.  The developer and Futurewise have appealed Normandy Park all the way to the Supreme Court, which now appears the only option to force Normandy Park to accept density.  The Growth Board ruled against Normandy Park two years ago for not meeting growth demands, but a Superior Court Judge overturned that decision.The MBA is considering a brief to support the developer in his push for smaller lots and more density.”

I like Normandy Park and I can understand why they may not want to join in on the movement toward higher density, but like Kirkland, they are being a bit “arrogant” as the MBA calls them (the title to this article was “Normandy Park remains arrogant”) in that they somehow don’t see why they need to participate in the Growth Management Act mandates that all cities are to implement with respect to growth and developing more density to minimize uncontrolled sprawl.

Readers, what do you think?  Should Normandy Park get away with ignoring GMA mandates?

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter